Greetings:
I respond to requests for both a summary and an explanation of how the issue affects the economy. In summary that the evidence confirms that the Supreme Court of Virginia, the Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board (“VSBDB”), Virginia Employment Commission (“VEC”), Attorney General Bob McDonnell, et al., aided and abetted a criminal conspiracy to retaliate against me for contacting Congress and the General Assembly for an investigation of the violation of separation of power: http://www.petitiononline.com/RDL/petition.html], and http://best-lawyer.tistory.com/entry/Isidoro-Rodriguez-Civil-Rights-LawyerFAMILY-LAW;
as well as for litigating to enforce my Federal and Virginia statutory rights as a parent, see http://www.home.earthlink.net/~isidoror/id6.html.
The linchpin of the conspiracy was for the VSBDB to revoke my license to practice law for suing to enforce my rights as a parent and attorney, see http://www.vsb.org/profguides/actions_jul06-dec06.html.
But, the VSBDB has no judicial authority under the laws of Virginia to revoke an attorney’s license. Thus, the VSBDB acted as a kangaroo court* to issue a void order. Due to this evidence of the VSBDB void order, I filed a Virginia Tort Claims Act and Virginia’s Business Conspiracy Act for illegally depriving me of my right to employment as an attorney and to federal unemployment compensation in violation of Federal and Virginia Criminal Codes. But, in violation of the right of access to an impartial court and a jury trial the Fairfax County Cir. Ct. dismissed the action based on absolute Judicial/Executive Branch immunity from accountability for criminal and tortious acts. The Supreme Court of Virginia affirmed.
As I noted, my challenges to the surreal holdings of absolute Judicial and Executive Branch immunity are now pending before the United States Supreme Court. Docket No. 08-339, 08-411, and 08-____(Petition for Cert. to be filed on or before October 30, 2008).
To understand the magnitude of the problem that the citizens of our State as well as the Republic have on its hands by the violation of separation of power by the Courts, I suggest for your reading, The Fraternity: Lawyers and Judges in Collusion, by John Fitzgerald Molloy. St. Paul, Minn.: Paragon House,* and a recent article, “How to Save the Courts” by Justice Sandra Day O’Conner, Parade Magazine, February 24, 2008.
In closing, in response to the question of “how this saves the state money?”, I contend that the current economic crisis is really a symptom of more fundamental problems. Can you have a good economy when you have inadequately or no restraints upon the government’s natural tendency to grow corrupt and out of control and to abuse power as evidence in my case? Can you sustain a good economy when the citizens cannot control government because it declares itself absolutely immune from suit for criminal and tortious acts? The answer is obvious–no.
The fact is that during the past 32 years that I have conducted federal civil rights litigation I have seen that the rights of the people to control abuse of government and its employees have been undercut by the Courts and the Bar. Who can afford to sue the government for malfeasance, even if you could find a lawyer willing and able to do so? This is no accident.
Have a good day.
Sincerely,
Isidoro Rodriguez,
Member in Good Standing of the Bar of the United States Supreme Court, the United State Court of Appeals for the 2nd, 3rd, 4th, D.C. and Federal Circuits, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, and United States Tax Court.
Law Offices of Isidoro Rodriguez
Virginia Office:
7924 Peyton Forest Trail
Annandale, Virginia 22003-1560
Telephone: 571.423.5066 and 703.573.1571
Telefax: 703.573.1571
Mobile Phone: 703.470.1457
E-Mail: isidoror@earthlink.net
Web: http://home.earthlink.net/~isidoror
South American Office:
World Trade Center-Barranquilla
Calle 76 No. 54-11, Suite 313
Barranquilla, Republic of Colombia, S.A.
Telephone: 011.5753.605288
*“Kangaroo court.” . . . 2. A. Court or tribunal characterized by unauthorized or irregular procedures, . . . . 3. A sham legal proceeding. . . .‘” Bryan A. Garner, Black’s Law Dictionary, at page 382 (8th ed., 1999). Emphasis added.
*Regarding The Fraternity, it concerns the “inside story of a great professional collusion in the pursuit of greed and power...." —Nicholas N. Kittrie, Distinguished University Professor and former Dean, American University School of Law; author of The War Against Authority: From the Crisis of Legitimacy to a New Social Contract. Also another review states that "...it is very clear...that the Courts in our judicial system have, in fact, become the lawmakers, when it is very clear...that our Constitution delegated that responsibility to the Congress of the United States and the State Legislatures....treads on almost sacred ground when he gives his readers the real insight into how the legal profession has truly changed from being one of the premier professions in our society to a business where the number one objective or bottom line is financial profit..." Dennis DeConcini, U.S. Senator (Ret).
Wednesday, October 15, 2008
Tuesday, October 14, 2008
No Absolute Judicial and Executive Branch Immunity for Malfeasance
On the above subject, I recently filed with the U.S. Supreme Court the following:
● on September 15, 2008, I filed a Petition for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, US S Ct. Docket No. 08-339, to compel the federal courts pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3771, to protect me as a victim from the on going federal criminal acts in retaliation for my petitioning Congress and litigating to enforce my federal statutory rights as a parent to secure visitations and protect my Son by the obstructing of my parental rights from 2003 until 2007 (See: http://home.earthlink.net/~isidoror ). At the time my Son who is a U.S. citizen was 14 yrs to 17 yrs old, wished to live with me in Virginia, but both the Judicial and Executive Branches refused to comply with their duty under a Treaty (after being deprived of his rights as a U.S. citizen for 5 years, once my Son was able to he returned to the US and now is in his second year at Virginia Tech).
The evidence confirms that the US Department of Justice (“DOJ”), the Federal Courts in the DC Circuit, the Attorney General and Supreme Court of Virginia, the Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board (“VSBDB”), the DC Committees on Admissions (“Committee”), and Lobbyist/Attorneys in DC, have criminally conspired to injure me by depriving me of employment in DC and federal unemployment compensation benefits in retaliation for my lawfully petitioning Congress and filing a civil RICO action based on the obstruction of his Federal statutory rights as a parent in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1204.
The linchpin of the conspiracy was for the VSBDB to revoke my license to practice law in Virginia.
However, the VSBDB is without judicial authority under the laws of Virginia to revoke an attorney’s license, and their order is void as issued by a kangaroo court. (”Kangaroo court.” . . . 2. A. Court or tribunal characterized by unauthorized or irregular procedures, esp. so as to render a fair proceeding impossible. 3. A sham legal proceeding. . . .‘” Bryan A. Garner, Black’s Law Dictionary, at page 382 (8th ed., 1999). Emphasis added.)
Despite this record the Federal lower courts have denied me of my statutory right to a trial by jury and dismissed a RICO suit I filed based on absolute judicial and ministerial immunity from accountability for the criminal acts of enforcing the VSBDB void order in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 242, 1513, and 3771, and for lack of venue of the federal action in D.C. see Isidoro Rodriguez, Esq. v. Editor in Chief, Legal Times, et al., DC D Ct. No. 07-0975, D.C. Ct. of Appeals by Special Designated Panel from 10th Cir. Docket No. 07524. I note also that on the 23rd and 25th of September, I finally was able to argue respectively before the U.S. Ct of Appeals for the 3rd and 4th Circuits against their enforcing the VSBDB void order based on the criminal conspiracy–the panel’s of both courts was in shock since they know they cannot enforce a void order.
● Consequently, on September 28, 2008, I filed a Petition for Writ of Certiorari challenging the above Lower Federal Courts dismissal of the RICO action by their declaring absolute Judicial and Ministerial immunity for the criminal conspiracy to deny access to an impartial court to vacate the VSBDB Void Orders.
● On or before October 30, 2008, I will file a second Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia to challenge their declaring absolute immunity for tort liability for acts outside of their authority by creating an illegal attorney disciplinary system in violation of the mandate of the General Assembly.
In closing, the record of government malfeasance and the surreal claim of absolute judicial and ministerial immunity brings into focus the case I argued and won before the US Supreme Court in 1995. There the Court rejected of the claim of DOJ which went well beyond even the “James Bond Defense of having a license to kill a target,” to argue that a drunk government agent, driving recklessly while receiving sexual favors from a prostitute was immune from suit for acting “within his scope of employment.” Martinez, et al. v. Lamagno and Drug Enforcement Administration, 515 U.S. 417 (1995). It is my belief that this was the motive to target me for my being the only federal civil rights litigation attorney residing outside of the United States who for 20 years opposed the Government’s assertion of world-wide jurisdiction while denying both US citizens and nonresidents alike who lived outside of the US no protection under the US Constitution, i.e, the rendition program and use of torture.
Because the concept of absolute immunity for government officials is a real danger to our Republic, I leave you with the following, "[f]ind out just what the people will submit to and you have found out the exact amount of injustice and wrong which will be imposed upon them; and these will continue until they are resisted with either words or blows, or with both. The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom they oppress. -- Frederick Douglass, civil rights activist, Aug. 4, 1857.
Review and Sign a Petition to General Assembly of Virginia to Investigate the illegal collusion of the Executive Branch with the Judicial Branch to usurp the restrictions and limitations placed on them by the Constitution: http://www.PetitionOnline.com/RDL/petition.html.
Have a good day.
Sincerely,
Isidoro Rodriguez,
Member in Good Standing of the Bar of the United States Supreme Court, the United State Court of Appeals for the 2nd, 3rd, 4th, D.C. and Federal Circuits, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, and United States Tax Court.
Law Offices of Isidoro Rodriguez
Virginia Office:
7924 Peyton Forest Trail
Annandale, Virginia 22003-1560
Telephone: 571.423.5066 and 703.573.1571
Telefax: 703.573.1571
Mobile Phone: 703.470.1457
E-Mail: isidoror@earthlink.net
Web: http://home.earthlink.net/~isidoror
South American Office:
World Trade Center-Barranquilla
Calle 76 No. 54-11, Suite 313
Barranquilla, Republic of Colombia, S.A.
Telephone: 011.5753.605288
● on September 15, 2008, I filed a Petition for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, US S Ct. Docket No. 08-339, to compel the federal courts pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3771, to protect me as a victim from the on going federal criminal acts in retaliation for my petitioning Congress and litigating to enforce my federal statutory rights as a parent to secure visitations and protect my Son by the obstructing of my parental rights from 2003 until 2007 (See: http://home.earthlink.net/~isidoror ). At the time my Son who is a U.S. citizen was 14 yrs to 17 yrs old, wished to live with me in Virginia, but both the Judicial and Executive Branches refused to comply with their duty under a Treaty (after being deprived of his rights as a U.S. citizen for 5 years, once my Son was able to he returned to the US and now is in his second year at Virginia Tech).
The evidence confirms that the US Department of Justice (“DOJ”), the Federal Courts in the DC Circuit, the Attorney General and Supreme Court of Virginia, the Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board (“VSBDB”), the DC Committees on Admissions (“Committee”), and Lobbyist/Attorneys in DC, have criminally conspired to injure me by depriving me of employment in DC and federal unemployment compensation benefits in retaliation for my lawfully petitioning Congress and filing a civil RICO action based on the obstruction of his Federal statutory rights as a parent in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1204.
The linchpin of the conspiracy was for the VSBDB to revoke my license to practice law in Virginia.
However, the VSBDB is without judicial authority under the laws of Virginia to revoke an attorney’s license, and their order is void as issued by a kangaroo court. (”Kangaroo court.” . . . 2. A. Court or tribunal characterized by unauthorized or irregular procedures, esp. so as to render a fair proceeding impossible. 3. A sham legal proceeding. . . .‘” Bryan A. Garner, Black’s Law Dictionary, at page 382 (8th ed., 1999). Emphasis added.)
Despite this record the Federal lower courts have denied me of my statutory right to a trial by jury and dismissed a RICO suit I filed based on absolute judicial and ministerial immunity from accountability for the criminal acts of enforcing the VSBDB void order in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 242, 1513, and 3771, and for lack of venue of the federal action in D.C. see Isidoro Rodriguez, Esq. v. Editor in Chief, Legal Times, et al., DC D Ct. No. 07-0975, D.C. Ct. of Appeals by Special Designated Panel from 10th Cir. Docket No. 07524. I note also that on the 23rd and 25th of September, I finally was able to argue respectively before the U.S. Ct of Appeals for the 3rd and 4th Circuits against their enforcing the VSBDB void order based on the criminal conspiracy–the panel’s of both courts was in shock since they know they cannot enforce a void order.
● Consequently, on September 28, 2008, I filed a Petition for Writ of Certiorari challenging the above Lower Federal Courts dismissal of the RICO action by their declaring absolute Judicial and Ministerial immunity for the criminal conspiracy to deny access to an impartial court to vacate the VSBDB Void Orders.
● On or before October 30, 2008, I will file a second Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Virginia to challenge their declaring absolute immunity for tort liability for acts outside of their authority by creating an illegal attorney disciplinary system in violation of the mandate of the General Assembly.
In closing, the record of government malfeasance and the surreal claim of absolute judicial and ministerial immunity brings into focus the case I argued and won before the US Supreme Court in 1995. There the Court rejected of the claim of DOJ which went well beyond even the “James Bond Defense of having a license to kill a target,” to argue that a drunk government agent, driving recklessly while receiving sexual favors from a prostitute was immune from suit for acting “within his scope of employment.” Martinez, et al. v. Lamagno and Drug Enforcement Administration, 515 U.S. 417 (1995). It is my belief that this was the motive to target me for my being the only federal civil rights litigation attorney residing outside of the United States who for 20 years opposed the Government’s assertion of world-wide jurisdiction while denying both US citizens and nonresidents alike who lived outside of the US no protection under the US Constitution, i.e, the rendition program and use of torture.
Because the concept of absolute immunity for government officials is a real danger to our Republic, I leave you with the following, "[f]ind out just what the people will submit to and you have found out the exact amount of injustice and wrong which will be imposed upon them; and these will continue until they are resisted with either words or blows, or with both. The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom they oppress. -- Frederick Douglass, civil rights activist, Aug. 4, 1857.
Review and Sign a Petition to General Assembly of Virginia to Investigate the illegal collusion of the Executive Branch with the Judicial Branch to usurp the restrictions and limitations placed on them by the Constitution: http://www.PetitionOnline.com/RDL/petition.html.
Have a good day.
Sincerely,
Isidoro Rodriguez,
Member in Good Standing of the Bar of the United States Supreme Court, the United State Court of Appeals for the 2nd, 3rd, 4th, D.C. and Federal Circuits, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, and United States Tax Court.
Law Offices of Isidoro Rodriguez
Virginia Office:
7924 Peyton Forest Trail
Annandale, Virginia 22003-1560
Telephone: 571.423.5066 and 703.573.1571
Telefax: 703.573.1571
Mobile Phone: 703.470.1457
E-Mail: isidoror@earthlink.net
Web: http://home.earthlink.net/~isidoror
South American Office:
World Trade Center-Barranquilla
Calle 76 No. 54-11, Suite 313
Barranquilla, Republic of Colombia, S.A.
Telephone: 011.5753.605288
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
