No Absolute Judicial and Executive Branch Immunity for Malfeasance

Good Morning,

Relating to the pending confirmation hearing on Eric Holder is Michael Isikoff's recent cover story in Newsweek, "The Fed Who Blew the Whistle," and the general issue of pardons, amnesties and similar measures for violation of FISA and other Congressional mandates under Watergate era legislation.

Based on my more than 32 years of experience as a independent federal civil/human rights litigation attorney who has successfully represented Hispanics against the malfeasance of DOJ,1 and as a former appointee in both the Carter and Reagan Administration, I know that irrespective of being a Republican, Democrat, or Independent each Senator must act now to restore the Rule of Law and assure compliance by U.S. Department of Justice of the mandate of separation of power and checks and balances (See Adam Cohen, "Democratic Pressure on Obama to Restore the Rule of Law," The New York Times, November 14, 2008).2

Thus, as a US. citizen and Nam Vet who took the oath 44 years ago to defend and protect the Constitution from, "all enemies, foreign and domestic," I petition to testify and present evidence in opposition to the confirmation of Eric Holder as Attorney General at the Senate Judiciary Committee’s hearing on January 8, 2009, because based on his action since 2003 as a typical Beltway attorney/lobbyis he is a defendant in a civil action to be filed by me in February 2009 in the U.S. District Court for D.C., under 18 U.S.C. § 3771 and civil RICO, as a victim of an on going federal criminal conspiracy http://capwiz.com/congressorg/sbx/f/?aid=12313551&r=1.

Finally, the evidence confirms that Eric Holder’s past policies at DOJ (i.e. the pardon of Marc Rich and other actions to usurp accountability), were the base on which former White House Counsel/Attorney General Gonzales worked from to direct DOJ to violate the rights of citizens.

Very truly yours,

Isidoro Rodriguez, Esq.
A member of the Bar of the United States Supreme Court;
of the U.S. Ct. of App for 2nd, D.C., and Fed. Cir.; and U.S. Tax Ct.
Web: http://home.earthlink.net/~isidoror
Web: http://justiciaportodo.webs.com
Blog: http://justiciaparatodo.blog.com

1After I argued and won Martinez v. Lamagno and DOJ/DEA, 515 U.S. 417 (1995), the Legal Times confirmed that I was the only known U.S. license practitioner residing outside of the U.S. and litigating in Federal Courts on behalf of resident and nonresident Hispanics, see also Lopez v. First Union, 129 F3.rd. 1186 (11th Cir. 1997)(Litigation that successfully stopped the unlawful seizing by DOJ of all nonresident Hispanic bank accounts in the U.S.)[Web: http://justiciaportodo.webs.com]

2The dangers to our Republic and citizens by collusion of DOJ with the Federal Courts are real. ". . . the Courts in our judicial system have, in fact, become the lawmakers, when it is very clear . . . that our Constitution delegated that responsibility to the Congress of the United States and the State Legislatures . . . the legal profession has truly changed from being one of the premier professions in our society to a business where the number one objective or bottom line is financial profit . . . " Dennis DeConcini, U.S. Senator (Ret). The Fraternity: Lawyers and Judges in Collusion, by John Fitzgerald Molloy. St. Paul, Minn.: Paragon House.